The Call of the Wild Film Adaptations: Comparing Page to Screen

Jack London’s masterpiece, The Call of the Wild, often finds its way onto the silver screen. Since it was first published in 1903, this gripping adventure novel has been adapted several times for movies and TV shows. But how do these adaptations compare to the classic literary work that inspired them? In this in-depth blog post, we will explore the similarities and differences between film adaptations of The Call of the Wild and the novel itself, focusing on key story elements, characterizations, and thematic depth.

The Novel: The Call of the Wild

The Call of the Wild tells the story of Buck, a domesticated dog who is stolen from his comfortable life in California and sold as a sled dog in the harsh, unforgiving wilderness of the Yukon. As Buck faces challenges and hardships, he learns to adapt to his new life, becoming more rugged and wild in the process.

London’s story is as much about the internal transformations of a dog as it is about his physical experiences. In many ways, it’s a story about the struggle between the civilized and the primitive, as Buck learns to shed the trappings of human society and tap into his ancestral instincts.

(&The_Call_of_the_Wild_Jack_London) View on Amazon

Key Film Adaptations

The Call of the Wild has been adapted into film several times over the years, with varying levels of creative license taken. Some notable adaptations include the 1935 film directed by William A. Wellman, the 1972 adaptation by Ken Annakin, and the most recent 2020 CGI-filled version directed by Chris Sanders.

The 1935 Adaptation

The 1935 film, starring Clark Gable as Jack Thornton, is an early attempt at translating London’s book to the big screen. While the basic plot of the book is retained, the movie places more emphasis on the human characters, in particular the relationship between Jack Thornton and his love interest, Claire Blake (played by Loretta Young). The added human drama and romance veer from the novel’s primary focus on Buck’s journey.

The 1972 Adaptation

The 1972 adaptation, starring Charlton Heston as John Thornton, is an earnest attempt to remain faithful to the source material. Heston delivers a strong performance, and the film does a respectable job capturing the harsh environment of the Yukon. However, it’s worth noting that the animal performances in this adaptation are somewhat lacking, falling short in conveying the full emotional journey of Buck.

The 2020 Adaptation

The most recent adaptation, starring Harrison Ford as John Thornton, utilizes the immense power of modern CGI to bring Buck to life. The computer-generated Buck is a captivating and expressive character, allowing viewers to experience his emotional transformation in a way live-action dogs cannot. However, the adaptation does take some liberties with the source material, including adding a completely new villain not found in the book. This addition shifts some focus away from Buck’s internal struggles.

Conclusion: Does Page Truly Translate to Screen?

While the various film adaptations of The Call of the Wild certainly have their merits, it’s clear that no adaptation has fully captured the depth and nuance of London’s novel. Aspects of the story, such as the internal transformation of Buck, are difficult to fully convey on screen. Each adaptation inevitably shifts the focus onto the human characters or introduces new elements to fit the cinematic medium.

That being said, the film adaptations can still serve as a gateway for new readers to discover the excellence of London’s original work. If you’ve seen and enjoyed one of these film adaptations, we highly recommend you read or listen to the novel to experience the full power of The Call of the Wild.

Read or listen to The Call of the Wild by Jack London